Skip to main content

Erratum to: The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review

Erratum

After publication of the article [1], it has been brought to our attention that the wrong title was used on initial publication. The correct title of this article is “The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review”. The original version of the article has been updated to reflect this.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Husebo B, Flo E, Engedal K. The Liverpool Care Pathway: a systematic review discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? BMC Medical Ethics. 2017;18:1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0205-x.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Flo.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0205-x

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husebo, B.S., Flo, E. & Engedal, K. Erratum to: The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 18, 52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0211-z

Download citation