As a result of the significant disruption that is being caused by the COVID-19 pandemic we are very aware that many researchers will have difficulty in meeting the timelines associated with our peer review process during normal times. Please do let us know if you need additional time. Our systems will continue to remind you of the original timelines but we intend to be highly flexible at this time.
Announcement
Featured articles
© tippapatt / stock.adobe.com
Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey
A balance is needed between the need to minimise the risk of adverse events whilst also ensuring internet-based interventions for suicide prevention are being validated on populations who may be most likely to benefit from them.
© PeopleImages / Getty Images / iStock
How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
A review of IRB documents found variations in the procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration.
Articles
-
-
The patient and clinician experience of informed consent for surgery: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence
-
Family discussions and demographic factors influence adolescent’s knowledge and attitude towards organ donation after brain death: a questionnaire study
-
Making researchers responsible: attributions of responsibility and ambiguous notions of culture in research codes of conduct
-
The polysemy of psychotropic drugs: continuity and overlap between neuroenhancement, treatment, prevention, pain relief, and pleasure-seeking in a clinical setting
-
Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists
-
The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?
-
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
-
Controversies and considerations regarding the termination of pregnancy for Foetal Anomalies in Islam
-
Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ethics in public health programmes
Latest collections
Cross-journal article collection
Translation in healthcare: ethical, legal, and social implications
Edited by Donna Dickenson, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, and Michael Morrison
Cross-journal article collection
Extending evidence-based medicine
Edited by Trisha Greenhalgh
Cross-journal article collection
Driving Regenerative Medicine to the Market and Clinic: An Exploration of Enablers, Impediments and Ethical-Legal Challenges
Cross-journal article collection
The Many Meanings of ‘Quality’ in Healthcare: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Edited by Deborah Swinglehurst
Aims and scope
BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
Editor
- Anne Menard, BioMed Central
Manuscript Editor
- Clare McFadden, BioMed Central
Assistant Editor
- Janelle Coore, BioMed Central
Section Editors
- Yvonne Denier, University of Leuven
- Beatrice Godard, University of Montreal
- Anita Ho, University of British Columbia
- Richard Huxtable, University of Bristol
- Jonathan Ives, The University of Birmingham
- Stuart Nicholls, University of Ottawa
- Jeremy Snyder, Simon Fraser University
Black Lives Matter
A collection of books, journal articles and magazine content that amplifies Black voices and the issues raised by the Black Lives Matter movement.
Read MoreAnita Ho, Section Editor
Anita Ho is an Associate Professor at the Centre for Applied Ethics at University of British Columbia and an Affiliate Faculty at the University of California, San Francisco. She has been Section Editor for the 'Ethics in biomedical research' section of BMC Medical Ethics since August 2015.
Announcing the launch of In Review
BMC Medical Ethics, in partnership with Research Square, is now offering In Review. Authors choosing this free optional service will be able to:
- Share their work with fellow researchers to read, comment on, and cite even before publication
- Showcase their work to funders and others with a citable DOI while it is still under review
- Track their manuscript - including seeing when reviewers are invited, and when reports are received
BMC Series Blog
Data Support Services pilot
Authors submitting to this journal can opt to use a new service that will make it easier to share research data.
Follow
2019 Journal Metrics
-
Citation Impact
2.451 - 2-year Impact Factor
2.88 - 5-year Impact Factor
1.705 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
1.15 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
Usage
715,939 downloads
Social Media Impact
3554 mentions
