As a result of the significant disruption that is being caused by the COVID-19 pandemic we are very aware that many researchers will have difficulty in meeting the timelines associated with our peer review process during normal times. Please do let us know if you need additional time. Our systems will continue to remind you of the original timelines but we intend to be highly flexible at this time.
Announcement
Featured articles
© oonal / Getty Images / iStock
Bin it or pin it? Which professional ethical guidance on managing COVID-19 should I follow?
Judgments can and should be informed (and constrained) by guidance, and hopefully these preliminary observations on the current ethical guidance on managing COVID-19 will provide some useful pointers for time-pressed professionals.
© PeopleImages / Getty Images / iStock
How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
A review of IRB documents found variations in the procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration.
Articles
-
-
Trust and professionalism in science: medical codes as a model for scientific negligence?
-
Identifying disincentives to ethics consultation requests among physicians, advance practice providers, and nurses: a quality improvement all staff survey at a tertiary academic medical center
-
Inter-physician variability in strategies linked to treatment limitations after severe traumatic brain injury; proactivity or wait-and-see
-
Under consent: participation of people with HIV in an Ebola vaccine trial in Canada
-
Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists
-
The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?
-
Human cloning laws, human dignity and the poverty of the policy making dialogue
-
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
-
Controversies and considerations regarding the termination of pregnancy for Foetal Anomalies in Islam
Latest collections
Cross-journal article collection
Translation in healthcare: ethical, legal, and social implications
Edited by Donna Dickenson, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, and Michael Morrison
Cross-journal article collection
Extending evidence-based medicine
Edited by Trisha Greenhalgh
Cross-journal article collection
Driving Regenerative Medicine to the Market and Clinic: An Exploration of Enablers, Impediments and Ethical-Legal Challenges
Cross-journal article collection
The Many Meanings of ‘Quality’ in Healthcare: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Edited by Deborah Swinglehurst
Aims and scope
BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
Editor
- Anne Menard, BioMed Central
Assistant Editor
- Janelle Coore, BioMed Central
Senior Editorial Board Members
Beatrice Godard, University of Montreal
Jonathan Ives, The University of Birmingham
Jeremy Snyder, Simon Fraser University
Black Lives Matter
A collection of books, journal articles and magazine content that amplifies Black voices and the issues raised by the Black Lives Matter movement.
Read MoreAnnouncing the launch of In Review
BMC Medical Ethics, in partnership with Research Square, is now offering In Review. Authors choosing this free optional service will be able to:
- Share their work with fellow researchers to read, comment on, and cite even before publication
- Showcase their work to funders and others with a citable DOI while it is still under review
- Track their manuscript - including seeing when reviewers are invited, and when reports are received
BMC Series Blog
Follow
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Speed
122 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
85 days to first decision for all manuscripts
235 days from submission to acceptance
16 days from acceptance to publicationCitation Impact
2.451 - 2-year Impact Factor
2.88 - 5-year Impact Factor
1.705 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
1.15 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)Usage
1,077,136 downloads
1,135 Altmetric mentions