Skip to main content

Table 3 Final analytical themes supported by interview and documentary data

From: Ethical challenges in global research on health system responses to violence against women: a qualitative study of policy and professional perspectives

Theme

Subtheme

Qualitative Interviews (n = 18)

Documents (n = 27)

1. Challenges resulting from the global nature of the group

1.1. Differing power and resources

11

Nuffield report 2002 [26]

Helsinki Declaration 2013 [24]

Nuffield Paper 2005 [27]

Nuffield Report 2020 [28]

CIOMS WHO Guidelines 2016 [25]

[HIC funder] Policy.2021

[HIC funder] Policy.2021

1.2. Differing RECs rules

13

Nuffield Paper 2005 [27]

Nuffield Report 2020 [28]

[HIC funder] Policy 2021

[HIC] University Guideline 2019

1.3. Solutions to differing power, resources, and rules

12

CIOMS WHO Guidelines 2016 [25]

Nuffield Paper 2005 [27]

Nuffield Report 2020 [28]

[LMIC] Government Legal 2013

2. Challenges resulting from the location of primary studies within health systems

2.1. Differing rules between university RECs and health authorities

4

[HIC funder] Policy 2021

2.2. Solutions to differing rules between university RECs and health authorities

1

 

3. Challenges resulting from the VAW topic

3.1. Differing conceptualisations of VAW

3

WHO Recommendations 2001 [29]

3.2. Differing conceptualisations of vulnerability of research participants

4

WHO Recommendations 2001 [29]

Helsinki Declaration 2013 [24]

[LMIC] Government Legal 2013

[LMIC] Government Legal 2016

[HIC] University Guideline 2019

[HIC] University Policy 2019

3.3. Limited REC methodological and topic expertise

5

 

3.4. Solutions to challenges resulting from the VAW topic

1

Nuffield Report 2002 [26]

  1. REC Research Ethics Committee, VAW violence against women, [] anonymised country