Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included participants

From: Evaluating the understanding of the ethical and moral challenges of Big Data and AI among Jordanian medical students, physicians in training, and senior practitioners: a cross-sectional study

 

Total

(n = 466)

Students

(n = 177)

Interns & Residents

(n = 234)

Fellows & Beyond

(n = 55)

p-value

Gender

    

0.299

 Female

228 (48.9%)

92 (52.0%)

114 (48.7%)

22 (40.0%)

 

 Male

238 (51.1%)

85 (48.0%)

120 (51.3%)

33 (60.0%)

 

Publication status

    

 < 0.001

 Zero

251 (53.9%)

143 (80.8%)

96 (41.0%)

12 (21.8%)

 

  ≥ 1

215 (46.1%)

34 (19.2%)

138 (59.0%)

43 (78.2%)

 

Current institution

    

 < 0.001

 KHCC

24 (5.2%)

4 (2.3%)

9 (3.8%)

11 (20.0%)

 

 Private sector

72 (15.5%)

0 (0.0%)

50 (21.4%)

22 (40.0%)

 

 Public sector

42 (9.0%)

6 (3.4%)

35 (15.0%)

1 (1.8%)

 

 RMS

37 (7.9%)

0 (0.0%)

17 (7.3%)

20 (36.4%)

 

 University Hospitals

291 (62.4%)

167 (94.4%)

123 (52.6%)

1 (1.8%)

 

I am familiar with Big Data and AI applications in healthcare

    

0.852

 Strongly disagree

86 (18.5%)

37 (20.9%)

40 (17.1%)

9 (16.4%)

 

 Disagree

100 (21.5%)

31 (17.5%)

57 (24.4%)

12 (21.8%)

 

 Neutral

161 (34.5%)

61 (34.5%)

82 (35.0%)

18 (32.7%)

 

 Agree

75 (16.1%)

30 (16.9%)

35 (15.0%)

10 (18.2%)

 

 Strongly agree

44 (9.4%)

18 (10.2%)

20 (8.5%)

6 (10.9%)