Table 1 Outcome of the (a) Cross-Sectoral Platform (SUEP) ethics votes of the initial application process (n = 35) and the amendment applications (n = 63) as well as both processes (= All, n = 98) and that of the (b) High-Resolution Platform (HAP) ethics votes of the initial application process (n = 11) and the amendment applications (n = 12) as well as both processes (= All, n = 23). Data are shown as absolute numbers and percentages of the corresponding total number of ethics votes
a | Â | Â | Â |
Ethics vote outcome SUEP | Initial; n (%) | Amendment; n (%) | All; n (%) |
Positive | 16 (46) | 47 (75) | 63 (64) |
Positive with notes | 10 (29) | 12 (19) | 22 (22) |
Approval under conditions | 6 (17) | 1 (2) | 7 (7) |
Modifications required before vote | 3 (9) | 2 (3) | 5 (5) |
Ethical concerns | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 1 (1) |
b | Â | Â | Â |
Ethics vote outcome HAP | Initial; n (%) | Amendment; n (%) | All; n (%) |
Positive | 6 (55) | 11 (92) | 17 (74) |
Positive with notes | 1 (9) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) |
Approval under conditions | 3 (27) | 1 (8) | 4 (17) |
Modifications required before vote | 1 (9) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) |
Ethical concerns | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |