Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees’ normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement

Table 4 associations between ERG participation (n = 160) and case presenting (n = 109) and the outcomes in those who responded multiple times, adjusted for time, department and profession

Variable	SACS offending	SACS Care/Security	SACS Treatment	Team Coercion Competence	User Involvement	Team Cooperation	Constructive Disagreement
Variable	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)
# ERG participation (ref = 0)
Intercept(mean in ref)	3.10	4.03	2.51	3.70	2.89	3.73	3.63
1–5 times	−0.07	−0.08	−0.05	0.15*	0.19 ~	0.02	−0.06
6 + times	0.02	0.01	0.08	0.02	0.10	0.07	−0.05
# Case presenting (ref = 0)
Intercept (mean in ref)	3.06	3.98	2.53	3.69	3.06	3.73	3.61
1 time	0.05	0.22*	0.01	0.17 ~	0.07	0.03	−0.02
2 + times	0.02	−0.04	−0.02	0.13	−0.11	0.06	0.02

a) Adj. = Adjusted for department, profession, and baseline outcome. Intercepts are unadjusted
~ p < 0.1; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

ISSN: 1472-6939