Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees’ normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement

Original Submission
21 Dec 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tilman Steinert
16 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ksenija Yeeles
10 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ksenija Yeeles
17 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ksenija Yeeles
8 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Bert Molewijk
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
20 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
26 Apr 2023 Editorially accepted
12 May 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12910-023-00909-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page