Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of clinical difficulties regarding consent and assent

From: Medical staff’s sense of awareness of informed consent for adolescent cancer patients and the need for decision-making support practiced from the perspective of trauma-informed approach

Items

Counts

(% of total, N = 56)

Often

Sometimes

Neither

Rarely

Never

1. Patient’s RMT

1

(1.8)

24

(42.9)

2

(3.6)

28

(50.0)

1

(1.8)

2. Assessment and dealing with parent’s RMT

3

(5.4)

24

(42.9)

4

(7.1)

24

(42.9)

1

(1.8)

3. Support of patient’s RMT

7

(13.0)

24

(44.4)

3

(5.6)

18

(33.3)

2

(3.7)

4. IC to patients

28

(50.0)

17

(30.4)

5

(8.9)

6

(10.7)

0

(0.0)

5. Explanation of disease and treatment to patients

26

(46.4)

21

(37.5)

3

(5.4)

6

(10.7)

0

(0.0)

6. Assessment and dealing with parent’s RMT

3

(5.4)

20

(35.7)

4

(7.1)

25

(44.6)

4

(7.1)

7. Explanation of disease and treatment to parents

30

(53.6)

14

(25.0)

2

(3.6)

7

(12.5)

3

(5.4)

  1. IC, informed consent; RMT, resistance to or refusal of medical treatment.