Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of results

From: A qualitative interview study of Australian physicians on defensive practice and low value care: “it’s easier to talk about our fear of lawyers than to talk about our fear of looking bad in front of each other”

General views on defensive practice

Defensive practice is:

of moderate to significant concern in Australian healthcare

underpinned by anxieties about “missing something” and “getting into trouble”

influenced more by the fear of peer criticism than the threat of formal legal sanctions

just one of multiple drivers of low value care (LVC)

Domain

Factors

Strategies

Specific factors that influence defensive practice and ameliorative strategies

Knowledge

Poor knowledge of the law

Insufficient understanding of harms of LVC at patient and system levels

Education on core legal standards and requirements (e.g. law requires reasonable care, not perfect care)

Education to improve knowledge of LVC and recognition of downstream harms

Skills

Inadequate skills in clinical reasoning and patient communication

Time constraints and patient characteristics can hinder application of skills

Training and mentorship, especially for junior doctors, in clinical reasoning and communication

Recognise value of investing time to avoid LVC

Support patients to develop health literacy skills

Professional role and identity

Professional identity as a “doer” leads to pro-intervention bias

LVC perceived as reassuring anxious patients

Reinforce patient safety as core to physicians’ role and identity

Challenge habitual practices that are of low value

Beliefs about consequences

Belief that tests and procedures will protect against negative outcomes

Risks of under-investigation seen as higher than risks of over-investigation

Increase awareness of harms of over-investigation, including broader recognition of what ‘harm’ can mean for patients (e.g. physical and emotional toll, time burden, financial costs)

Environmental context and resources

Inadequate organisational support

Poor processes for managing complaints and investigations

Foster collegiality and openness

Ensure timely and supportive processes that address environmental context

Social influences

Desire to avoid peer criticism

Conformity to culture of defensive practice and over-investigation

Challenge norms of ‘just in case’ interventions

Avoid ‘blame-and-shame’ culture of practice

Emotions

Fear of ‘missing something’

Takes bravery to resist LVC

Strengthen tolerance of uncertainty

Leadership and support from senior clinicians