Skip to main content

Table 1 The average proportions of the six specialties who stated that arguments were (very or rather) important

From: How to reveal disguised paternalism: version 2.0

Arguments

The 2007 study

The 2020 study

Important: Yes % (95% CI)

Prioritized (n = 338)

Important: Yes %

Prioritized (n = 572)

Respect for patient’s autonomy

(n = 661)

87% (84–90)

55% (50–60)

(n = 714)

88% (86–90)

50% (46–54)

Patients do not know their own good

(n = 679)

74% (71–77)*

7% (4–10)

(n = 702)

59% (55–63)*

4% (2–6)

Autonomy principle precedes non-maleficence principle

(n = 656)

54% (50–58)

3% (1–5)

(n = 699)

57% (53–61)

6% (4–8)

Non-maleficence principle precedes autonomy principle

(n = 677)

63% (59–67)

35% (30–40)

(n = 697)

68% (65–71)

40% (36–44)

  1. The participants were also asked to prioritize between the four arguments—also in both the 2007 study and the 2020 study, respectively. In order to compare the 2007 study with the 2020 study, palliative care physicians were not included in the 2020 study. An * means that the 95% CI is not overlapping each other indicating that if a hypothesis test had been conducted the difference would have been significant (p < 0.05)