# | Position statement (rating category)* | Rank | |
---|---|---|---|
5 | Parental authorization for ongoing, or future unspecified research should include the provision of information related to existing data governance (RI + D) | 1 | |
8 | The decision to share pediatric genomic and associated clinical data should be supported by an evaluation of realistic risks and benefits (F + C) | 2 | |
3 | Parents should be informed in a transparent manner how their child’s genomic and associated clinical data will be securely managed and used (RI + C) | 3 | |
1 | The best interests of children are primary (RI + F) | 4 | |
7 | Professionals involved in consent processes related to data sharing and data-intensive research have the responsibility to balance potential benefits and risks. A trained designate should be available to discuss these with parents at the time of consent (D + F) | 5 | |
9 | Duplicative collection of genomic research data involving pediatric patients should be avoided (D + F) | 6 | |
13 | Incidental (secondary) findings of clinically actionable, validated genomic results should be made available | 6 | |
6 | Values conveyed by family, legal guardians or primary care givers should be respected when possible (RI + F) | 7 | |
2 | Children should be listened to, and involved in decision-making processes related to genomic and associated clinical data sharing in developmentally appropriate ways (D + F) | 8 | |
4 | In a research context, data sharing infrastructures should enable children to withdraw consent to continued sharing of their genomic and associated clinical data when possible upon reaching the age of majority (D + F) | 8 |