Peer Review reports
From: A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Nov 2020 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 5 Jan 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 24 Feb 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels G Mede |
| 18 Mar 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne M. Dijkstra |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Mar 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne M. Dijkstra |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 29 Mar 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels G Mede |
| 8 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Apr 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Apr 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12910-021-00615-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.