Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors

Original Submission
14 Dec 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Jun 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Aug 2020 Author responded Author comments - Mervyn Conroy
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Aug 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Dec 2020 Author responded Author comments - Mervyn Conroy
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Dec 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mervyn Conroy
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mervyn Conroy
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mervyn Conroy
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 Jan 2021 Editorially accepted
18 Feb 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12910-021-00581-y

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page