Peer Review reports
From: Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jul 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Sep 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tina Rulli |
4 Oct 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Benjamin Berkman |
14 Nov 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Julian Koplin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Nov 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tina Rulli |
2 Dec 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Benjamin Berkman |
17 Dec 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Julian Koplin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Jan 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Julian Koplin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Jan 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Jan 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Julian Koplin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Jan 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jan 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
31 Jan 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12910-020-0449-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.