Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better

Original Submission
16 Sep 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Oct 2019 Author responded Author comments - Mila Petrova
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Oct 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2019 Editorially accepted
24 Dec 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12910-019-0433-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page