Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support

Original Submission
17 Apr 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Borovecki
16 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anders Bremer
27 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Eva van Baarle
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Oct 2019 Author responded Author comments - Eva van Baarle
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
14 Oct 2019 Editorially accepted
1 Nov 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12910-019-0418-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page