Peer Review reports
From: Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Apr 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Jun 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana Borovecki |
| 16 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anders Bremer |
| 27 Sep 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva van Baarle |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Oct 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva van Baarle |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Oct 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Oct 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Nov 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12910-019-0418-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.