Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services

Original Submission
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Manuel Schaper
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eline Bunnik
2 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Silvia Camporesi
15 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Wasson
17 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - PASCAL BORRY
14 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Manuel Schaper
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Silvia Camporesi
20 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eline Bunnik
4 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Wasson
23 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Manuel Schaper
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 May 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12910-018-0292-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page