Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research

Original Submission
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hallvard Fossheim
4 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Signe Mezinska
15 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Strand
12 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Tansey
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Tansey
Resubmission - Version 3
22 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Tansey
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0203-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page