Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An empirical study of the ‘underscreened’ in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates

Original Submission
10 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
6 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0143-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page

BMC Medical Ethics

ISSN: 1472-6939

Contact us