Skip to main content

Table 2 Cross-tabulation illustrating a model of the decision-making axes upon which clinical information was weighted to make decisions

From: Eating and drinking interventions for people at risk of lacking decision-making capacity: who decides and how?

Decision-making axes

Description

Risks, burdens and benefits

Comparison and weighting of the different treatment options and interventions by their potential effectiveness, dangers, outcomes and side-effects.

Treatment goals

The intended outcome, either specific to a particular treatment/interventions, place (institution/home) for future care for the patient or the overall intended outcome.

Normative ethical values

A balancing of actions in terms of ethical value. Actions in terms of their utilitarian value, i.e., increasing patient well-being and/or longevity; and deontological value, i.e., it was a ‘good’ course of action regardless of outcome.

Interested parties

Discussions incorporated the views of all involved stakeholders, which could include: the patient or their previous wishes, clinical team, relatives, etc.