Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review

Original Submission
21 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Soren Holm
22 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Gavaghan
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jerry Menikoff
27 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Carl Coleman
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Carl Coleman
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Carl Coleman
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-9-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page