Skip to main content

Table 1 Supports and barriers to patient accrual and mean approach rates

From: Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network

  

Mean approach rate (n)

t-test p value

  

Sites answering "Yes"

Sites answering "No"

 

Supports Available for the Registry

1. Do you work with the "Stroke Team" (attend ward rounds, discharge planning meetings, receive referrals or patient lists from the team, etc.)

70.4 (11)

69.4 (9)

0.8651

 

2. Do your physicians (attending/investigator/residents/fellows) help you obtain patient consents?

73.0 (9)

71.6 (9)

0.7503

 

3. Is there a neurology/stroke prevention clinic where TIA/stroke patients are seen following emergency department visits at your hospital?

68.9 (15)

73.0 (5)

0.5084

 

4. Do you have support from your emergency department (notification of new patients, providing brochures for patients not admitted to hospital, etc.)

80.5 (5)

66.9 (14)

0.0183

Barriers to Recruitment

1. Will your institution allow you to collect the minimal dataset on all patients?

70.1 (18)

69.0 (2)

0.901

 

2. Will your institution allow you to obtain lists of potential stroke patients from ED and the wards?

70.4 (19)

60.6 (1)

0.417

 

3. Will your institution allow you to directly approach admitted patients to consent to participate in the Registry?

71.1 (18)

59.9 (2)

0.1962

 

4. If a "potential" registry participant has been discharged (or never admitted) will your institution allow you to contact the patient to participate in the registry?

72.0 (13)

65.7 (6)

0.2877

 

5. Will your institution allow you to obtain telephone consent?

69.2 (6)

69.7 (12)

0.9446