Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network

Original Submission
16 Dec 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Aveyard
7 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerald Schatz
15 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Don Willison
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerald Schatz
31 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Aveyard
13 Apr 2006 Author responded Author comments - Don Willison
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Apr 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerald Schatz
28 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Aveyard
5 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Don Willison
Resubmission - Version 4
5 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 May 2006 Editorially accepted
23 May 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-7-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page