Skip to main content

Table 3 Key information for informed consent: public and ECs opinion ordered from the more to the less important in the public’s view

From: Public’s attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey

 

Public

ECs

Fisher Exact test

 

N = 123

N =48

P-value

Type of biological materials taken for a biobank creation

111 (90%)

44 (92%)

1.000

Purpose for which biological materials will be used

110 (89%)

48 (100%)

0.021

Communication of research results

104 (85%)

21 (44%)

0.000

Prohibition of the commercialisation of samples and related data

98 (80%)

24 (50%)

0.000

Right to withdraw consent to the use of samples

98 (80%)

47 (98%)

0.002

Right to withdraw consent to the use of data

97 (79%)

42 (89%)

0.275

Authorisation to be recontacted

86 (70%)

30 (63%)

0.367

Rules to protect subjects’ privacy

83 (67%)

46 (96%)

0.000

Independent ethics committee review

65 (53%)

18 (38%)

0.089

Transfer of samples and related data to other research institutes

65 (53%)

31 (65%)

0.175

Authorisation to contact family members

62 (50%)

11 (23%)

0.001

Access to samples and data from external researchers

59 (48%)

26 (54%)

0.499

Destiny of samples and data in case of advanced research conclusion

58 (47%)

25 (52%)

0.612

Solidarity character of the participation

53 (43%)

36 (75%)

0.000

Information on Intellectual Property Rights and patents

53 (43%)

20 (42%)

1.000

Location of biological materials collection

48 (39%)

37 (77%)

0.000

Destiny of samples and data after donor’s death

41 (33%)

17 (35%)

0.858

Information on the property of samples

40 (33%)

25 (52%)

0.023

Duration of the storage

35 (28%)

32 (67%)

0.000

Benefit-sharing

0 (0%)

3 (6%)

0.021

  1. Significant (p < 0.05) differences between public and ECs were highlighted.