Skip to main content

Table 1 Responses

From: Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons

Overall references in systematic review:

n = 75

Excluded references or questionnaires not sent:

11/75 (15%)

No valid e-mail address found

2/75 (3%)

Not transformed into questionnaire*

4/75 (6%)

Explicit rejection in pilot survey**

3/75 (4%)

No reaction in pilot survey**

1/75 (1%)

Unburden author who was already in pilot survey**

1/75 (1%)

Questionnaires sent (vs. overall references):

64/75 (85%)

Pilot survey

9/75 (12%)

Main survey

55/75 (73%)

Overall responses (vs. questionnaires sent):

19/64 (30%)

Completed responses:

13/64 (20%)

Incompleted responses:

5/64 (8%)

Other responses:

1/64 (2%)

No responses (vs. questionnaires sent):

45/64 (70%)

Adjusted response rate (only completed responses):

13/64 (20%)

  1. *Due to possible conflict of interests with certain authors/author groups, or knowing beforehand that certain authors would be unable to participate.
  2. **Relates only to authors/author groups from whom more than 1 reference was included in the review, and who had participated with 1 of their references in the pilot study (excluded references = total references by authors/author group minus the 1 reference in the pilot study).