Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of respondents in the content validity testing

From: Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)

Characteristics respondents

Step I CVI* and individual think-aloud

Step II CVI and focus group

Step III CVI mailed

Step IV CVI and individual think-aloud

Step V CVI and focus groups

Step VI CVI and focus group

Step VII CVI and think-aloud

Sum mean (range)

Participants

5

11

16

14

12

5

5

73

Female/male

4/1

8/3

11/5

10/4

9/3

3/2

5/0

50/18

Age (years)

53

48

-

54

45

53

45

49 (37–68)

Experience of MCD

3

0

0

0

12

0

0

15

Profession

        

Nurse

3

4

2

5

2

1

5

22

Head/administrator

1

2

3

3

5

2

 

16

Ethicists/facilitators

3

 

4

 

7

1

 

15

Physician

 

2

3

1

 

1

 

7

Physiotherapist

 

3

1

1

   

5

Chaplain

1

 

2

 

2

  

5

Nurses assistant

   

3

  

5

8

Social scientist

  

2

 

2

  

4

Social worker

  

1

1

   

2

Other

    

1

  

1

Specialty

        

Medicine

 

2

2

4

1

  

9

Surgery

1

2

 

4

   

7

Psychiatry

 

1

3

 

1

  

5

Neurology

1

2

     

3

Home nursing care

   

4

 

4

7

15

Paediatrics

 

2

1

    

3

Geriatrics/Pall med**

  

3

1

   

4

Habilitation

    

5

1

 

6

Ethics support service

2

   

5

1

 

8

Other

1

2

7

1

  

3

14

Country

        

Sweden

5

11

 

14

   

30

Netherlands

  

7

 

12

  

19

Great Britain***

  

9

    

9

France

     

5

 

5

Norway

      

10

10

  1. *CVI = Content Validity Index [31] **Palliative medicine ***Members of UK Clinical Ethics Network.