Peer Review reports
From: Comparison of ethical judgments exhibited by clients and ethics consultants in Japan
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tsuen-Chiuan Tsai |
| 6 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rouven Christian Porz |
| 22 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stella Reiter-Theil |
| 26 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bert Molewijk |
| 11 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Noriko Nagao |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tsuen-Chiuan Tsai |
| 31 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stella Reiter-Theil |
| 6 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bert Molewijk |
| 26 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Noriko Nagao |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Feb 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Mar 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.