Making HIV screening similar to screening for other treatable medical conditions | |
---|---|
Benefits | Risks or Harms |
Theme: Destigmatizes HIV testing | Theme: Ignores exceptional nature of HIV |
Sub-theme: Destigmatizes who is at risk and removes stereotypes about risk | Sub-theme: Leads to persistence of stigma and adverse social, societal problems |
Theme: Leads to positive downstream affects | |
Sub-theme: Underestimates gravity of HIV diagnosis | |
Sub-theme: Identifies more HIV infections | |
Sub-theme: Falsely equates HIV with other sexually transmitted diseases | |
Sub-theme: Increases testing utilization | |
Sub-theme: Downplays significance of HIV in society | |
Sub-theme: Identifies people earlier in infection | |
Theme: Leads to potential for poor or cavalier implementation of HIV testing recommendations | |
Sub-theme: Promotes view of HIV as a treatable, chronic condition | |
Theme: Promotes screening by inadequately prepared clinicians | |
Theme: Encourages unneeded, superfluous testing | |
Sub-theme: Gives an understanding of the true extent of the HIV epidemic | Theme: Fails to individualize screening |
Theme: Creates conflicts in physician-patient relationships | |
Sub-theme: Improves public health | |
Theme: Facilitates HIV testing | |
Sub-theme: Increases provider comfort in offering HIV screening | |
Sub-theme: Increases patient comfort in being tested for HIV | |
Sub-theme: Encourages other medical/public health groups to recommend routine HIV screening | |
Sub-theme: May lead to third-party insurers to pay for routine HIV screening | |
Sub-theme: Streamlines HIV testing process for providers | |
Sub-theme: Increases patient comfort in being tested for HIV | |
Sub-theme: Makes testing more convenient and accessible for patients | |
Theme: Promotes view of HIV testing as a routine part of maintaining health | |
Theme: Eliminates HIV exceptionalism | |
Theme: Eliminates the assumptions about risk for HIV and associated stereotypes | |
Theme: Normalizes HIV testing in comparison to other screening tests | |
Theme: Engenders belief that HIV screening is a part of maintaining good health | Â |
How does making HIV screening similar to screening for other treatable medical conditions fulfill responsibilities to patients? | How does making HIV screening similar to screening for other treatable medical conditions violate responsibilities to patients? |
Theme: Conducts necessary screening for maintaining and promoting health | |
Theme: Violates obligation to assess patient’s emotional health and safety before testing | |
Theme: Obtains more information about patient’s health and health needs | |
Theme: Ignores exceptional nature of HIV | |
Theme: Identifies unrecognized HIV infections and facilitates linkage to care | |
Theme: Facilitates HIV testing | |
Theme: Facilitates harm and risk reduction to patients and their contacts | |
How does making HIV screening similar to screening for other treatable medical conditions respect patients’ rights? | How does making HIV screening similar to screening for other treatable medical conditions violate patients’ rights? |
Theme: Incorporates a process into good, standard clinical care | Theme: Creates a potential for poor or cavalier implementation of HIV testing recommendations |
Theme: Leads to increased testing, which has positive downstream effects | |
Theme: Reduces stigma |