Peer Review reports
From: How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 16 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Grady |
| 19 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Stark |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Klitzman |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Stark |
| 5 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Grady |
| 13 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Klitzman |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Grady |
| 20 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Klitzman |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-12-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.