Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gentian Vyshka |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thaddeus Pope |
3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leslie Whetstine |
8 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lieve Van den Block |
6 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gentian Vyshka |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leslie Whetstine |
1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thaddeus Pope |
1 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gentian Vyshka |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leslie Whetstine |
4 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gentian Vyshka |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gentian Vyshka |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
15 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-12-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.