Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees’ normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement

Table 2 Adjusted associations between time, survey participation, ERG participation, department and profession

	SACS offending	SACS Care/Security	SACS Treatment	Team Coercion Competence	User Involvement	Team Cooperation	Constructive Disagreement
Variable	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)	B adj.^a)
Time
Intercept(Mean at T0)	3.13	4.11	2.59	3.64	2.81	3.69	3.55
T1 vs T0	−0.02	−0.10*	−0.02	0.06	0.08	0.05	0.05
T2 vs T0	0.02	−0.12**	0.01	0.03	0.17**	0.02	0.08 ~
Department	reference category = Hospital 2 Acute
Intercept (Mean in ref.)	3.20	4.13	2.64	3.65	2.71	3.73	3.60
Hosp.1Geriatric	−0.11	−0.06	−0.10	−0.19 ~	0.18	−0.24**	−0.30**
Hosp.2Community	−0.01	−0.06	−0.16 ~	0.03	0.19*	0.06	0.04
Youth	−0.18*	−0.15*	−0.26**	−0.17 ~	0.29**	< 0.01	−0.09
Specialist	0.06	−0.19*	−0.14	0.06	0.35**	0.05	0.06
Hosp.3Acute	−0.16*	0.07	0.12	0.20*	0.32***	0.04	−0.10
Rehabilitation	−0.32***	0.07	0.01	0.16 ~	0.13	0.09	0.10
Profession	reference category = Psychiatrists and related professions
Intercept (Mean in ref.)	3.12	4.06	2.47	3.70	3.18	3.79	3.71
Psychologists	0.44***	−0.22*	−0.18	−0.06	−0.04	−0.23*	−0.13
Nurses	0.06	< 0.01	0.01	−0.08	−0.32***	−0.04	−0.12
Other professions	0.03	−0.11	0.08	−0.07	−0.24*	−0.10	−0.18*
Management	−0.34*	0.12	−0.04	0.24	−0.30 ~	< 0.01	0.05

a) Adj. = Coefficients adjusted for time, department, profession, and number of times responded. Intercepts are unadjusted
~ p < 0.1; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
b) We executed additional analyses in which we adjusted for number of times that participants were included in the survey. We found 6 significant differences (p < 0.05) and therefore we adjusted for numbers of times that participants were included in the survey
c) ERG Participation and Case Presenting are removed from this analysis towards a separate analysis that is restricted to persons who participated at least twice and had baseline data on the outcomes (see part IV and Table 4 in this Results section)
Adjusted associations between time, department, profession and general levels of seven outcomes; Based on linear mixed models (additionally adjusted for number of times participants were included in the survey^b)^c

ISSN: 1472-6939