Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Medical Ethics

Fig. 3

From: Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees’ normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement

Fig. 3

Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between ERG Participation groups in changes in SACS Offending (panel a) and between Case Presenting groups in changes in User Involvement (panel b), Constructive Disagreement (panel c) and Team Cooperation (panel d). Based on respondents who participated in at least two time points, had valid data on ERG Participation or Case Presenting, and baseline data for the outcome (for ERG participation: N = 160, for Case Presenting: N = 109). Models were adjusted for the baseline level of the outcome in order to make the initial outcome comparable between ERG and Case Presenting participants and non-participants

Back to article page

BMC Medical Ethics

ISSN: 1472-6939

Contact us