Skip to main content

Table 7 Suggestion for future EOL discussion and POLST-K completion

From: Experience and perspectives of end-of-life care discussion and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment of Korea (POLST-K): a cross-sectional study

Categories

n (%)†

Physicians

Nurses (n = 293)

Total (n = 181)

Attending (n = 94)

Resident (n = 87)

Simplification of the procedures

74 (40.9)

37 (39.4)

37 (42.5)

82 (28.0)

Grant physicians immunity against criminal, civil, or disciplinary sanctions

51 (28.2)

30 (31.9)

21 (24.1)

54 (18.4)

Sufficient human resources

49 (27.1)

21 (22.3)

28 (32.2)

118 (40.3)

Provision of tools for predicting the disease course

47 (26.0)

23 (24.5)

24 (27.6)

63 (21.5)

Standardized guidelines for POLST-K completion

38 (21.0)

21 (22.3)

17 (19.5)

73 (24.9)

Liaison services for ethical and legal consultation

37 (20.4)

24 (25.5)

13 (14.9)

40 (13.7)

Adequate reward for the process itself

20 (11.0)

13 (13.8)

7 (8.0)

11 (3.8)

Education for better communication

19 (10.5)

9 (9.6)

10 (11.5)

67 (22.9)

Provision of patient education materials, such as video clips or leaflets

17 (9.4)

8 (8.5)

9 (10.3)

54 (18.4)

Applying in conjunction with DNR

9 (5.0)

2 (2.1)

7 (8.0)

15 (5.1)

  1. EOL End-of-life; POLST Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment; DNR Do not resuscitate
  2. †Multiple responses (two of the most significant items were selected)