From: Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia
General approach |
As with other healthcare interventions, use of MTDs requires informed consent |
The person’s values and preferences should be elicited and reflected in all discussions |
Staff who provide information and seek consent must have sufficient knowledge themselves of the information that needs to be conveyed and the requirements for informed consent |
Information provision |
The information provided must be accurate and balanced, and this requires consideration of the quality of evidence that MTDs will be successful in achieving clinically meaningful endpoints that are important to a patient, and of the uncertainty regarding benefit |
It is not acceptable to focus on the potential benefits and downplay the potential harms from MTDs |
An adverse effect on quality of life and enjoyment of eating and drinking is as important an issue for discussion with patients as any physical effects of MTDs |
Patients cannot make appropriate decisions for themselves if the information that they are given by professionals is flawed and unbalanced |
Voluntariness of decisions regarding modified texture diets |
For consent to be valid it must be given freely and voluntarily |
People must be supported to understand that they are the decision makers and can make their own choices, including the choice to refuse to consent to MTDs |
The voluntariness of patients’ decisions is questionable if they are told ‘you must’ when ‘you might consider’ is more appropriate |
Having capacity to make decisions regarding modified texture diets |
The burden of proving a lack of capacity to take a specific decision always lies upon the professional who is challenging capacity |
Unless based on accurate and balanced information, inappropriate judgements and recommendations may be made by substitute decision makers |
Improvements needed |
Research is required to examine in greater detail current informed consent processes in different settings |
There is a need for staff to reflect on their current practice regarding use of MTDs with an awareness of the currently available evidence and through the ‘lens’ of informed consent |
A significant change in practice is needed in those residential care settings where there is insufficient access to SLTs and where staff may recommend or even impose MTDs without an adequate understanding of the issues involved |
Professional bodies and guidelines regarding management of dysphagia should be clear about the need for informed consent before use of MTDs is advised |