Skip to main content

Table 9 Significant differences between NAs†, RNs‡, and physicians

From: What outcomes of moral case deliberations are perceived important for healthcare professionals to handle moral challenges? A national cross-sectional study in paediatric oncology

Outcome

Mean (SD)

P-value

More important according to NAs † than RNs ‡

NAs†

RNs‡

 

5. Contributes to the development of workplace practice/policies

3.57 (0.55)

3.32 (0.67)

0.037

12. Enhances my understanding of ethical theories

3.33

(0.71)

3.03

(0.82)

0.030

14. Greater opportunity for everyone to have their say

3.67

(0.52)

3.47

(0.57)

0.039

26. I understand better what it means to be a good professional

3.64

(0.57)

3.33

(0.75)

0.014

More important according to NAs † than physicians

NAs†

Physicians

 

6. Gives me more courage to express my ethical standpoint in EDS§

3.27

(0.81)

2.79

(0.92)

0.047

15. Enhances possibility to share difficult emotions and thoughts

3.64

(0.65)

3.21

(0.86)

0.023

17. I listen more seriously to other’s opinions

3.47

(0.70)

2.89

(0.94)

0.016

24. Enhances mutual respect among co-workers

3.67

(0.67)

3.42

(0.61)

0.049

More important according to RNs ‡ than physician

RNs‡

Physicians

 

6. Gives me more courage to express my ethical standpoint in EDS§

3.24

(0.70)

2.79

(0.92)

0.040

7. I feel more secure expressing doubts or uncertainty regarding EDS§

3.52

(0.67)

3.05

(0.97)

0.027

  1. † NA: Nursing Assistant; ‡ RN: Registered Nurse; § EDS: Ethically difficult situations