Skip to main content

Table 4 All respondents’ perceptions of the 26 outcomes descending by mean

From: What outcomes of moral case deliberations are perceived important for healthcare professionals to handle moral challenges? A national cross-sectional study in paediatric oncology

Outcome (N = 181)

Very Important (4)

Quite Important (3)

Somewhat Important (2)

Not Important (1)

  

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Median (Range)

Mean 1–4 (SD)

2. More open communication among co-workers. (n = 180)

144 (79)

33 (18)

2 (1)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.78 (0.48)

1. Develops my skills to analyse EDS†. (n = 177)

127 (69)

48 (26)

2 (1)

0 (0)

4 (2–4)

3.71 (0.48)

8. Better mutual understanding of each other’s reasoning and acting. (n = 178)

124 (68)

48 (26)

5 (3)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.66 (0.56)

13. Enables me and my co-workers to decide on concrete actions. (n = 180)

124 (68)

50 (27)

5 (3)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.65 (0.56)

16. Find more course of actions. (n = 178)

115 (63)

60 (33)

3 (2)

0 (0)

4 (2–4)

3.63 (0.52)

24. Enhances mutual respect among co-workers. (n = 178)

120 (66)

47 (26)

10 (6)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.61 (0.62)

9. I see the EDS† from different perspectives. (n = 176)

114 (62)

50 (27)

12 (7)

0 (0)

4 (2–4)

3.58 (0.62)

4. Enables me to better manage stress caused by EDS†. (n = 178)

111 (61)

56 (31)

9 (5)

2 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.55 (0.65)

15. Enhances possibility to share difficult emotions and thoughts. (n = 179)

115 (63)

49 (27)

12 (7)

3 (2)

4 (1–4)

3.54 (0.70)

14. Greater opportunity for everyone to have their say. (n = 180)

103 (56)

70 (38)

6 (3)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.53 (0.59)

11. Increases my awareness of the complexity of EDS†. (n = 179)

103 (56)

62 (34)

13 (7)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.49 (0.66)

25. I become aware of my own preconceived notions. (n = 177)

102 (56)

60 (33)

14 (8)

1 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.49 (0.67)

10. I and my co-workers become more aware of recurring EDS†. (n = 179)

105 (57)

58 (32)

14 (8)

2 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.49 (0.69)

22. I and my co-workers manage disagreements more constructively. (n = 176)

106 (58)

53 (29)

15 (8)

2 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.49 (0.70)

23. I gain more clarity about my own responsibility in EDS†. (n = 179)

96 (53)

68 (37)

13 (7)

2 (1)

4 (1–4)

3.44 (0.68)

7. I feel more secure to express doubts or uncertainty regarding EDS†. (n = 176)

99 (54)

60 (33)

12 (7)

5 (3)

4 (1–4)

3.44 (0.75)

3. Consensus is gained among co-workers when handling EDS†. (n = 179)

98 (54)

63 (34)

14 (8)

4 (2)

4 (1–4)

3.42 (0.73)

18. Increases awareness of my own emotions. (n = 178)

95 (52)

65 (36)

14 (8)

4 (2)

4 (1–4)

3.41 (0.73)

26. I understand better what it means to be a good professional. (n = 174)

96 (53)

56 (31)

19 (10)

3 (2)

4 (1–4)

3.41 (0.75)

19. Strengthens my self-confidence to handle EDS†. (n = 177)

95 (52)

65 (36)

11 (6)

6 (3)

4 (1–4)

3.41 (0.76)

5. Contributes to the development of the workplace’s practice/policies. (n = 177)

85 (46)

78 (43)

13 (7)

1 (1)

3 (1–4)

3.40 (0.65)

20. Develops my ability to identify the core ethical question in the EDS†. (n = 178)

90 (49)

65 (36)

17 (9)

6 (3)

4 (1–4)

3.34 (0.79)

17. I listen more seriously to other’s opinions. (n = 177)

77 (42)

74 (40)

19 (10)

7 (4)

3 (1–4)

3.25 (0.80)

21. I and my co-workers examine existing practice/policies more critically. (n = 174)

68 (37)

82 (45)

20 (11)

4 (2)

3 (1–4)

3.23 (0.74)

6. Gives me more courage to express my ethical standpoint in EDS†. (n = 180)

71 (39)

80 (44)

24 (13)

5 (3)

3 (1–4)

3.21 (0.78)

12. Enhances my understanding of ethical theories. (n = 177)

62 (34)

82 (45)

26 (14)

7 (4)

3 (1–4)

3.12 (0.80)

  1. †EDS: Ethically difficult situations