Skip to main content

Table 10 Significant differences between centres reported using P-values

From: What outcomes of moral case deliberations are perceived important for healthcare professionals to handle moral challenges? A national cross-sectional study in paediatric oncology

Domain

Outcome (N = 181)

Centre

A vs. all other

B vs. all other

Enhanced collaboration

8. Better mutual understanding of each other’s reasoning and acting

< 0.001

0.024

24. Enhances mutual respect among co-workers

0.001

0.029

14. Greater opportunity for everyone to have their say

0.038

 

22. I and my co-workers manage disagreements more constructively

0.009

 

Enhanced emotional support

4. Enables me to better manage stress caused by EDS†

 

0.001

7. I feel more secure to express doubts or uncertainty regarding EDS†

0.004

0.002

18. Increases awareness of my own emotions

 

0.002

19. Strengthens my self-confidence to handle EDS†

0.017

0.005

Improved reflexivity

1. Develops my skills to analyse EDS†

< 0.001

 

9. I see the EDS† from different perspectives

0.003

0.003

11. Increases my awareness of the complexity of EDS†

 

0.032

12. Enhances my understanding of ethical theories

0.024

 

Concrete results

13. Enables me and my co-workers to decide on concrete actions

0.038

 

16. Find more course of actions

0.001

 

3. Consensus is gained among co-workers when handling EDS†

0.002

 

Impact on organizational level

10. I and my co-workers become more aware of recurring EDS†

 

0.011

21. I and my co-workers examine existing practice/policies more critically

0.039

 

Improved moral attitude

23. I gain more clarity about my own responsibility in EDS†

0.010

0.005

25. I become aware of my own preconceived notions

0.035

< 0.001

26. I understand better what it means to be a good professional

0.004

0.006

6. Gives me more courage to express my ethical standpoint in EDS†

0.006

0.020

  1. †EDS: Ethically difficult situations