Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics

From: Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes

Location

Setting

Study design

Study period

Population

Sample size (N =)

Reference #

United States

1 medical/surgical ICU at a large, tertiary, not-for-profit medical center

Prospective randomized exploratory trial

October 2007 to February 2010 (28 months)

English-speaking adult patients received treatment in the medical/surgical ICU for at least 5 days

384 (Intervention N = 174, Control N = 210)

[48]

Norway

9 different hospitals from six different locations in Norway

Qualitative Study

2006–2009 (36 months)

Doctors who had referred EOL decision to a CEC, or has been a member of a medical team who requested CEC assistance

15

[49]

Sweden

1 publicly funded children's hospital in Sweden

Qualitative Study

Not indicated

Healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, nurse assistants, psychologist, and play therapists) working at hospital

6 ECR sessions observed, 35 healthcare professionals in the six ECR sessions; 10 healthcare professionals were individually interviewed outside of the ECR sessions

[50]

United States

large tertiary care facility that is both a community hospital and a major academic medical center

Quality Improvement

July 1–December 31 in 2011 and 2013 (10 months total)

Nurses who requested CEC

15

[51]

Chile

ICU at a private clinic in Santiago, Chile

Quality Improvement

Not indicated

Intensivist Physicians

26

[52]

United States

562 bed academic hospital

Quality Improvement

2011–2012 (12 months)

Staff, students, patients, families

184

[53]

Sweden

integrated heart-failure and specialist palliative in-home programme at Palliative Advanced Homecare and Heart Failure Care

Qualitative, descriptive study

Only indicates year May 2013

PREFER team (specialized care team) consisting of physicians (1 cardiologist, one GP specializing in palliative medicine), RNs (2 district nurses one heart failure palliative care nurse), OT (1), and physiotherapist (1)

7

[54]

United States

Adult ICUs of 7 US hospitals selected to represent a broad spectrum of characteristics, including community, religious, managed care, and academic institutions with diverse patient populations. All have busy ICUs and active CECs

Mixed methods

Not indicated

Healthcare providers and patients/surrogates/family members who were identified as potentially having a values conflict

363 (N = 108 family members, N = 255 HCPs)

[55]

United States

600-bed academic hospital in a large metropolitan city in the MidWest

Qualitative Study

Not Indicated

Healthcare professionals representing multiple areas of the hospital and consisted of nurses, physicians, and social workers

16

[56]

United States

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Quality Improvement

August 1985–April 1992 (~ 80 months)

Family members and staff involved in the consultation

26 (N = 6 family members, N = 40 staff members)

[57]

Netherlands

Neonatal intensive care unit of a pediatric teaching hospital in the Netherlands

Quality Improvement

Not indicated

Multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (physician, nurse, nurse practitioners, social worker, pastor) involved in the MEDM (medical ethical decision-making)

105

[58]

Sweden/Norway/Netherlands

Community care, somatic hospital care, psychiatry, care for mentally disabled, Dutch health inspectorate, and hospital policy departments

Descriptive Longitudinal field survey and psychometric testing

Not indicated

Nurses (RNs, Support Workers, Psychosocial Workers), Nurse Assistants, Doctors/Specialists/Psychiatrists, Therapists (Physiotherapists, Psychologist, Spiritual Caregivers, and Social Workers), Managers (Department Heads and Policy Makers), and Others (Volunteers, Clients, Researchers, Trustees, Secretary's and Interns)

443 HCPs participating in 4 MCDs across 30 institutions (Sweden = 6, Netherlands = 10, Norway = 14) (T1)

247 HCP's participating in 8 MCDs across 25 institutions (Sweden = 6, Netherlands = 5, Norway = 14) (T2)

[59]

United States

ICU for terminally ill/critically ill patients at Hospital in the US

Prospective, controlled group design study

June 1992–October 1994 (28 months)

ICU patients treated with > 96 continuous mechanical ventilation

99

[60]

United States

Nonprofit tertiary hospital in Los Angeles

Retrospective analysis; quality

July 1–December 31 in 2011 and 2013 (10 months total)

Members of clinical team who requested consultation (i.e. physician, social worker, and nurse)

91 questionnaires completed by 58 individuals

[61]

Norway

Norwegian Hospitals (Number Unspecified)

Qualitative study

Period not indicated; study began in May 2004

Clinicians who had brought cases to the ethics committees for case consultation

8

[62]

Japan

Japan; as the first clinical ethics service in Japan, informed general public of service thru mass media and team's medical institution affiliations in Japan

Quality Improvement

October 2006–December 2007 (14 months)

Medical practitioners

25 consultations; 22 of which were requests from medical practitioners (N = 18 responses received)

[63]

United States

6 hospitals

Randomized Control Trial

2000–2002 (24 months)

Patients in adult intensive care unit

499 (of 551 study patients); intervention (n = 252) vs control (n = 247)

[64]

Taiwan

3 surgical intensive care units in Hospital

Randomized control trial

Not indicated

Patients in surgical intensive care units with "medical uncertainty/conflict regarding value-laden issues"

62 patients (33 randomly assigned to HCEC group; 29 randomly assigned to UC group)

[65]

Australia

Centre for Children's Health Ethics and Law (CCHEL); situated within a 359-bed, tertiary-quaternary pediatric hospital

Quality Improvement

Referrals from February 2015-January 2017. Design proceeded in three phases over a study period of 24 months

Healthcare staff (consultant medical officers, nurses, allied healthcare professionals, advanced trainee medical officers, social workers)

35 responses from 11 cases

[66]

Netherlands

Dutch organization for aged care in the south of Netherlands consists of 20 care centres

Mixed Method Evaluation study

Period not indicated; study occurred in 2009

Nursing caregivers of different educational levels, motivational therapists, dietitians, team leaders

61 moral case deliberation (MCD) sessions organized in 16 care centres; 493 questionnaires returned (team leaders N = 43, professional caregivers N = 450); 5 in-depth interviews and 3 focus groups

[67]

United States

712-bed community teaching hospital with 700 member private medical staff

Prospective Study

January 1, 1988–December 31, 1989 (12 months)

Requesting physicians and patients referred for consultation

104 requests; 83 physicians participated (80%); 104 patients

[68]

United States

University teaching hospital

Prospective study

Period of evaluation July 1, 1986 to June 2, 1987 (11 months)

Requesting physicians and patients referred for consultation

51 requests; 45 physicians

[69]

Germany

Large German general hospital with over 1700 beds and 26 specialized clinical departments

Observational study

January 2006-June 2015 (~ 103 months)

Adult inpatients in 3 inpatient settings: ICU, low care units, psychiatric care

259 CECs (ICU 43.6%, low care units 33.6%, psychiatric care units 22.8%)

[70]

Canada

No information about clinical setting; all participants were from Toronto, Canada

Qualitative

Not indicated

Family caregivers involved in making care and treatment decisions for a hospitalized family member at the end of life

20 (12 women, 8 men; 2 from the same family); only 5 participants used the services of the clinical ethicist during their decision-making process

[71]

Norway

Community Health and Care Settings

Quality Improvement

January–March 2015 (1st survey) and April- September 2015 (2nd survey(7 months)

Municipal contact persons for the ethics project (ethics activities implemented in the health and care sector in more than 200 municipalities), and ethics facilitators

137 (municipal contact persons); 217(ethics facilitators)

[72]

Norway

19 Norwegian Hospitals

Prospective questionnaire (Mixed Method)

September 2016–2017 (12 months)

Clinicians, patients, next of kin, managers, patient ombudsman, CEC members

61

[73]

United States

476-bed teaching hospital and tertiary referral center of New York Medical College

Quality Assurance (Quality Improvement)

January 1990-December 1992 (24 months)

Physicians, nurses, patients, family members who were associated with 20 sequential cases referred to CEC

61 (24 physicians; 20 nurses; 17 patients or family members) regarding 20 consultations in a two-year period

[74]

United States

Suburban community hospital

Economic Analysis

July-December 1994 (5 months)

Economic analysis of 29 patient cases/consultations

29

[75]

Netherlands

Academic psychiatric hospital

Quality Improvement

4 year project (48 months)

Participants of MCD sessions (e.g., nurse, psychologist/therapist, physician, manager/chief, other occupation)

69

[76]

United States

Department of Family Medicine at 625-bed tertiary care teaching hospital

Retrospective design (medical chart review) and physician evaluation

August 1, 1990–July 31, 1991 (12 months)

Requesting physicians

43 attending physicians

[77]

United States

Department of Family Medicine 625-bed tertiary care teaching hospital

Prospective study

February 1, 1994–January 31 1995 (12 months)

Patients, caregivers (parents, spouses, adult sons/daughters, siblings, other family member, friends)

56 interviews with patients or their surrogates (caregivers)

[78]

United States

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio—includes a 630 bed county hospital and 700-bed Veterans Administration hospital

Prospective study and retrospective design

18 month period (January 1984- June 1985)

Physicians who requested consultations

24 (physician requestors) regarding 44 consultation

[79]

Germany

University hospital

Nonparticipating observation of consultations (prospective and retrospective) and subsequent qualitative evaluation

Not identified

Ethicists, physicians, nurses, psychologists

28 interviews and 14 observations

[80]

United States

Medical and pediatric ICUs in a university medical center

Prospective, randomized controlled intervention trial

February 1997–October 1998 (20 months)

Patients in whom value-based treatment conflicts arose during the course of treatment; healthcare providers and family members involved with the 23 intervention patients who had received ethics consultation

N = 70 (CEC group n = 35; UC = 35); Interviews, N = 55; n = 47 providers (28 medical doctors, 14 registered nurses, 3 social workers, 1 managed care representative, 1 chaplain), n = 8 family members

[81]

United States

Adult ICUs of 7 hospitals across the US

Multi-centre prospective randomized controlled intervention trial

November 2000–December 2002 (24 months)

Adult patients in whom value-related treatment conflicts arose during the course of treatment that could lead to incompatible courses of action; interviews with nurses, physicians, patients or surrogates who received ethics consultations

N = 551 (CEC group n = 278; UC = 273); Interviews, N = 383 (n = 272 nurses and physicians, n = 111 patients and surrogates—2 pts, 109 surrogates)

[82]

Sweden

Psychiatric outpatient clinics in a county in Sweden

Qualitative study (exploratory/descriptive design)—content analysis

Not identified

Healthcare personnel (working in 2 different psychiatry outpatient clinics with experience of participating in ethics rounds)

11

[83]

United States

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Quality Improvement

Period not identified, study began in Spring 1990

Health professionals who deal directly with patients and families and who are called upon to make decisions regarding appropriate patient care

794 (n = 213 staff physicians, n = 176 resident physicians, n = 370 nurses, n = 26 social workers, n = 9 pastoral care staff) [46% of respondents had used the Dept of Bioethics—consult service for the purposes of this scoping review]

[84]

United States

Medical-surgical ICU at a comprehensive 470-bed academic cancer center in New York City

Retrospective design (using ICU, hospital, and ethics databases)

September 2007–December 2011 (51 months)

Adult patients with cancer who were admitted to the ICU and who had an ethics consultation

53

[85]

Netherlands

Large mental health care institution

Mixed method (responsive evaluation method through dialogue with stakeholders) structured interviews and semi-structured questionnaire conducted after request received before start of the session and subsequent evaluation questionnaire after MCD Likert scale and open ended questions)

April 2008–April 2011 (36 months)

Managers and nurses

78 (Pre Session) and 255 (Post MCD)

[86]

United States

Nine critical and special care units at Saint Thomas Hospital in Nashville, TN—a 670 bed adult acute-care facility and a teaching hospital affiliated with a university medical center

Qualitative survey

Did not indicate

Clinical ethicist, nurses and physicians involved in the individualized CEC (the clinical ethicist participated in self-evaluation)

88 (n = 37 ethicists, n = 23 nurses, n = 28 physicians)

[87]

United States

350-bed university-affiliated community hospital in Portland, OR

Mixed Method

1993–1995 (24 months)

CEC requestors (requests were made by attendings, consultants, residents, nurses, ancillary staff, hospital administrators, medical staff committees)

45

[47]

United States

Single-site 900 + bed academic medical centre with a dedicated ECMO programme

Mixed Method (retrospective review of EC documentation and semi-structured interview)

August 15, 2018 to May 15, 2019 (9 months)

Clinicians caring for patients on ECMO

Interviews N = 20

Chart Review N = 68

[88]

United States

PICU in a quaternary care children's hospital; PICU has 26 beds

Pre/post design and using retrospective historical controls

Does not indicate

Physicians and nurses on staff in the pediatric intensive care unit; patients were identified for PEACE round discussions and historical controls

N = 126 patient cases (n = 60 CEC group, n = 66 historical control group); N = 42 ( n = 32 nurses and n = 10 physicians) completed the pre/post survey

[89]

United States

Single large academic healthcare system in the Midwest that includes two urban adult hospitals and one pediatric hospital

Survey and qualitative interview

Does not indicate

Healthcare professionals involved in the care of a patient who was the focus of a CEC, hc professionals who initiated a CEC, or who were present at a patient care conference attended by an ethics consultant

N = 115 professionals completed the survey; N = 48 interviews (n = 9 social workers, n = 22 nurses, n = 17 physicians), representing 13 consultations

[90]

United States

Pediatric teaching hospital

Retrospective chart review and structured interviews (5-point Likert scale and open ended narrative)

September 4, 1990-April 10, 1995 (55 months)

Pediatric ethics consultations; physicians, social workers, family members

N = 35 pediatric ethics consultations (chart review); n = 23 physicians or social workers, n = 4 family members, involved with 23 of the consultations (interview survey)

[91]

Sweden

University hospital (peritoneal dialysis and dialysis), general hospital (medical assessment unit), community hospital (internal medicine, dialysis, geriatric cardiology), and municipalities (rehab, short-term care)

Explorative qualitative interview study utilizing semi-structured interview

Not identified

First-line managers

11

[92]

Netherlands

2 transgender clinics offering gender affirming medical treatment (clinic at the Centre of Expertise for Gender Dsymorphia at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre; clinic at Curium-Leiden University Medical Center)

Mixed Method (qualitative interviews, focus groups and questionnaire that includes a 26 item survey and open ended questions)

Not identified

Specialists in child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology, endocrinology, pediatric endocrinology, surgeons and gynecologists

N = 6 MCD sessions were audiotaped & analyzed; N = 6 individual interviews with MCD participants; N = 2 focus groups (15 participants total); N = 34 (Pre-Session) N = 22 (Post-MCD) questionnaire

[93]

United States

A large, tertiary academic medical centre

Qualitative interview study

May 2020 to July 2020

Healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, social workers, etc.) involved in an ethics consult between March 11, 2020 and May 6, 2020

14

[94]