Skip to main content

Table 2 The identified statements

From: Withdrawing or withholding treatments in health care rationing: an interview study on ethical views and implications

Themes

#

Statement

Context

Patients’ need for treatment

1

An ill medical condition can make a physician’s decision to withdraw or withhold a treatment easier

PHY/POR

 

2

An ill medical condition can make the physician more willing to take higher risks and not withhold treatments

PHY

 

3

It might be easier for both the physician and the patient when withdrawing or withholding a treatment from a patient if alternative treatments exist

PHY/POR

 

4

The patient’s quality of life is important when deciding to withdraw or withhold treatment

PHY/POR

Treatment effect in relation to alternative treatments

5

The healthcare sector provides inefficient treatments to patients

PHY/POR

 

6

Treatments are commonly withdrawn too late from patients in practice

PHY/POR

 

7

Physicians sometimes withhold treatments from patients due to cost-effectiveness

PHY/POR

 

8

Physicians sometimes withdraw treatments from patients due to cost-effectiveness

PHY/POR

 

9

Physicians commonly withdraw treatments from patients because they are ineffective or cause harm, rather than for cost-effectiveness reasons

PHY/POR

 

10

A treatment that has been proven to be ineffective for a specific patient should be withdrawn

PHY/POR

 

11

It must be acceptable for physicians to withdraw ineffective treatments

PHY/POR

 

12

A treatment that has proven to be effective for a specific patient should not be withdrawn by the healthcare service, even if it is not reimbursed

PHY/POR

 

13

A treatment that has proven to be effective for a patient participating in a clinical study should not be withdrawn

PHY/POR

 

14

Patients can understand if a treatment is withdrawn after a clinical study

POR

 

15

The expected net patient benefit of a treatment can affect the physician’s decision to withdraw or withhold a treatment

PHY

 

16

It can be helpful for a physician to evaluate a treatment’s effects when deciding to withdraw a treatment

PHY/POR

 

17

It can be difficult for a physician to evaluate all effects a treatment has or will have for a patient

PHY/POR

 

18

The use of one treatment can exclude the use of alternative treatments

POR

Patient–professional communication

19

Involving patients in decision-making can facilitate withdrawals

PHY/POR

 

20

Agreements between a physician and a patient can facilitate treatment withdrawals

PHY/POR

 

21

Agreements between a physician and a patient can be the difference between withdrawing and withholding treatments

POR

 

22

It can be easier to withdraw a treatment if the physician informs the patient of the conditions for the treatment before starting it

PHY/POR

 

23

It is easier for the physician to withdraw treatments if the patient understands the information given to them

PHY/POR

Patient–professional relationship

24

The physician should represent the patient when deciding to withdraw or withhold treatments

PHY/POR

 

25

Having a relationship between the physician and the patient can facilitate treatment withdrawal

PHY/POR

 

26

Spending extra time to support a patient psychologically makes it easier for the patient if their treatment is withdrawn

POR

 

27

It can be comforting for relatives if the physician decides whether a treatment is withdrawn or withheld

PHY

 

28

Having too close a relationship between the physician and the patient can make the physician act unprofessionally when withdrawing a treatment

PHY

 

29

The physical meeting with patients makes it more difficult for physicians to decide to withdraw or withhold treatments for specific patients than for patient groups

PHY/POR

Healthcare responsibility

30

It is a physician’s obligation to withdraw ineffective or harmful treatments

PHY/POR

 

31

A physician has more obligations when prescribing unofficial treatments to patients

PHY/POR

 

32

Patients might lose confidence in the healthcare system if effective treatments are withdrawn because of reimbursement status

PHY

 

33

Expensive treatments should be publicly funded

POR

 

34

The pharmaceutical company should finance effective treatments for patients after a study is completed until an official recommendation is given

PHY/POR

Ethical values

35

It is psychologically easier to withhold a treatment due to cost-effectiveness than to withdraw it

PHY/POR

 

36

There is an ethical difference between withdrawing and withholding treatments due to a lack of cost-effectiveness

PHY/POR

 

37

It is more important for physicians to make an individual assessment for patients with previous access to treatments that lack cost-effectiveness than to withdraw treatments to uphold patient equality

PHY/POR

 

38

Patients might not experience the same human value if their treatments are withdrawn due to a lack of cost-effectiveness

POR

 

39

Withdrawing and withholding treatments differently might lead to patients seeking healthcare from other healthcare providers

PHY/POR

 

40

It is unjust when different healthcare providers withdraw and withhold treatments unequally

PHY/POR

Professional support

41

Physicians feel alone when deciding to withdraw or withhold treatments

PHY

 

42

It can be helpful for a physician to consult other physicians when deciding to withdraw or withhold treatments

PHY

 

43

Guidelines from a national level on treating new patients and patients with previous access to treatments after new recommendations can facilitate treatment withdrawals for physicians and patients

PHY/POR

 

44

Guidelines from a national level should be accessible for physicians

PHY

 

45

Guidelines from a national level may not be applicable in all healthcare scenarios

POR

 

46

It could be helpful for a physician to have reflected on ethical problems related to priorities when making priority decisions

PHY/POR

Reimbursement system

47

Physicians and patient organization representatives are supportive of healthcare making priority decisions

PHY/POR

 

48

Physicians tend to prioritize their own patient groups

PHY

 

49

Patient organizations represent their own patient groups

POR

 

50

The treatment assessment process is not sufficiently transparent for patients

POR

 

51

Patients are not sufficiently involved in the treatment assessment process

POR

 

52

Patients want access to new treatments

POR

 

53

It takes a long time for authorities to implement new treatments

PHY/POR

 

54

A patient cannot demand access to the experimental treatment in a clinical study

PHY/POR

 

55

There is a difference between what is medically best and what is practically possible when prioritizing treatments between patients

PHY/POR

  1. PHY, physician; POR, patient organization representative