Skip to main content

Table 1 Inclusion criteria for funding organisations, research institutions and documents

From: A chronological discourse analysis of ancillary care provision in guidance documents for research conduct in the global south

Selection of research funding organisation

Selection of local (Malawi) research institutions and regulatory bodies

Inclusion criteria of document

Those directly provide funding for research studies in RCS (Malawi)

Involved in reviewing and approving study plans, and monitor study progress—Research Ethics Committees

The ethics guidelines and policy or regulatory documents were included if they contained statements with key phrases that represent various discourses that could imply the provision of ancillary care to research participants

Conducts a wide range of research projects including clinical trials—Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research programme

Protection of participants rights, safety, life, health, and well-being

Preparations or plans for participant’s care

Respect for participants rights and integrity

Responsible for regulation of all health research conducted in Malawi—Malawi Ministry of Health Research department

Care as an act of kindness

Beneficence

Participant interests considered first

Responsiveness of research towards participants health needs

Responsible for the development of research ethics guidelines—National Commission for Science and Technology

Researchers’ responsibility or duty to care

Morally praiseworthy

Provide care as appropriate, feasible, or necessary

Participants care obligation