Skip to main content

Table 1 Background characteristics of respondents

From: Trust and digital privacy in healthcare: a cross-sectional descriptive study of trust and attitudes towards uses of electronic health data among the general public in Sweden

 

High-truster (n = 1283)

Low-truster (n = 286)

In total (n = 1569)

81.9% (80.0–83.8)

18.1% (16.2–20.0)

Sex

  

 Man (n = 680)

82.1% (79.2–85.0)

17.9% (15.0–20.8)

 Woman (n = 884)

81.8% (79.3–84.3)

18.2% (15.7–20.7)

Age

  

 18–24 years (n = 387)

85.5% (82.0–89.0)

14.5% (11.0–18.0)

 25–34 years (n = 344)

83.7% (79.8–87.6)

16.3% (12.4–20.2)

 35–49 years (n = 368)

80.4% (76.3–84.5)

19.6% (15.5–23.7)

 50–64 years (n = 335)

78.8% (74.5–83.1)

21.2% (16.9–25.5)

 65 years and more (n = 121)

77.7% (70.3–85.1)

22.3% (14.9–29.7)

Education

  

 Primary school (n = 201)

74.6% (68.6–80.6)

25.4% (19.4–31.4)

 High school (n = 654)

82.4% (76.4–88.4)

17.6% (11.6–23.6)

 University (n = 705)

83.3% (80.5–86.1)

16.7% (13.9–19.5)

Self-reported health status

  

 Good or very good (n = 1190)

84.2% (82.1–86.3)*

15.8% (13.7–17.9)*

 Rather good (n = 303)

75.9% (71.1–80.7)

24.1% (19.3–28.9)

 Bad or very bad (n = 72)

66.7% (55.8–77.6)

33.3% (22.4–44.2)

Knowledge about use of medical records

  

 Good or very good (n = 495)

80.8% (77.3–84.3)

19.2% (15.7–22.7)

 Bad or very bad (n = 1059)

82.2% (79.9–84.5)

17.8% (15.5–20.1)

Experience of working within healthcare

  

 Yes (n = 304)

82.2% (77.9–86.5)

17.8% (13.5–22.1)

 No (n = 1260)

81.7% (79.6–83.8)

18.3% (16.2–20.4)

Country of origin

  

 Sweden or another Nordic country (n = 1406)

81.9% (79.9–83.9)

18.1% (16.1–20.1)

 Non-Nordic country (n = 163)

79.1% (72.9–85.3)

20.9% (13.9–27.9)

  1. Background variables of respondents in relation to their trust in how the healthcare system handles and protects patient information from unauthorized access. Very or fairly high trust grouped as ‘high-trusters’, very or fairly low trust grouped as ‘low-trusters’. Results presented as proportions with a 95% confidence interval). A * shows that the CIs are not overlapping (vertically), indicating that if a hypothesis test were conducted the p-value would have been < 0.05