Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of the MCD sessions

From: Conceptualizing the impact of moral case deliberation: a multiple-case study in a health care institution for people with intellectual disabilities

MCD #

Moral dilemma

as defined by the group in the first part of the session (3)

Conclusion of MCD session

1

Should I inform the Inspectorate about our worries about the home situation of our client or is the home situation beyond the limits of our care?

Intention to be more open to connection with client’s relatives; no plans made for practice

2

Should I keep the client in the group activity room or allow the client to move around in the building when the client is restless?

Intention to discuss practical actions in subsequent meeting

3

May I share information from a confidential talk with a client with my team or should I respect the client’s wish not to share it?

New consensus on existing statement

4*^

May we leave the client alone when taking care of clients in another building or should we take the client with us?

New consensus on existing statement and making plans for practical consequences

5*

Are we allowed to stop home care to protect care workers´ health and safety, or is it our duty to continue home care for this client?

Making plans for concrete actions

6^

Should we go along with the wishes of the client’s relatives or should we set a limit, based on our professional expertise?

Making plans for concrete actions

7

Should we stop home care for this care-refusing client, or should we continue and intensify care with out-of-home placement?

Making plans for concrete actions

8

May I apply a freedom-restrictive tool to this child when parents’ wish it to be applied, or may I refrain from using it, as I feel doubtful about its effectiveness?

Open ended, no plans made for practice

  1. *Clients’ relatives present
  2. ^Not observed, included on basis of facilitators’ report