From: What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: an exploratory study
 | Factor 1 (General—closeness) | Factor 2 (Fear of change) | Factor 3 (Mandatory security) | Factor 4 (Voluntariness) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 < 25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
 25–29 | 0.54 [0.27, 1.07] | 0.61 [0.30, 1.21] | 0.38** [0.18,0.77] | 1.41 [0.71, 2.81] |
 30–34 | 0.62 [0.30, 1.26] | 0.67 [0.33, 1.35] | 0.68 [0.33, 1.67] | 1.15 [ 0.57, 2.32] |
 35 +  | 0.63 [0.33, 1.18] | 0.68 [0.36, 1.26] | 1.05 [0.56, 1.96] | 1.06 [0.57, 1.99] |
Male | 0.95 [0.60, 1.52] | 1.13 [0.71, 1.80] | 0.57** [0.36, 0.92] | 1.19 [0.75, 1.91] |
Education | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 No degree | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
 Bachelor's degree | 0.56* [0.32,0.97] | 0.69 [0.40, 1.19] | 0.89 [0.52, 1.54] | 1.45 [0.84, 2.51] |
 Advanced degree | 0.44** [0.26, 0.73] | 1.09 [0.65,1.82] | 0.55* [0.32, 0.92] | 0.89 [0.53, 1.49] |
 Familiar with the concept of moral bioenhancement | 0.90 [0.55, 1.45] | 0.59* [0.36, 0.95] | 0.94 [0.59,1.54] | 1.14 [0.70, 1.84] |
 Utilitarian reasoning | 2.41*** [1.56, 3.75] | 0.63* [0.41, 0.97] | 1.88** [1.22, 2.91] | 1.01 [0.66, 1.55] |