Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of participant demography and their responses on euthanasia related questions

From: Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study

Category

Frequency and percentage (%)

Experience and education

First-year medical undergraduate

143 (33.6)

Final-year medical undergraduate

141 (33.2)

Practicing doctors

141 (33.2)

Gender

Male

178 (41.9)

female

247 (58.1)

Religion

Buddhism

344 (80.9)

Catholicism/Christianity or Evangelical faith

22 (5.2)

Islam

15 (3.5)

Hindu

24 (5.6)

Atheist

16 (3.8)

Undisclosed

4 (0.9)

Primary source of knowledge on euthanasia

Undergraduate/Post graduate curriculum

155 (36.4)

Seminars – professional and religious

128 (30.1)

Journal articles

108 (25.4)

Media/Internet

192 (45.1)

Peer education

125 (29.4)

Opinion on legalising euthanasia

Yes

200 (47.1)

Undecided

115 (27.1)

No

110 (25.9)

What illnesses should euthanasia be an option for

Terminal cancer

188 (44.2)

Degenerative neurological disease

177 (41.6)

End organ failure

129 (30.3)

Pain and suffering with any terminal illness

180 (42.3)

No response

82 (19.2)

Reasons for not favouring euthanasia*

It is against my religious beliefs

103 (24.2)

It is against my conscience

115 (27.0)

Doctors should not interfere with the course of the nature

81 (19.0)

It is a violation of the Hippocratic oath

45 (10.5)

It is equivalent to murder

71 (16.7)

Experience of past requests for euthanasia by a patient

First-year undergraduate

5 (3.4%)

Final-year undergraduate

40 (28.3%)

Practicing doctors

47 (33.3%)

Self-acceptance of euthanasia

Yes

312 (73.4)

No

113 (26.6)

Circumstances for self-acceptance of euthanasia

Loss of dignity

46 (14.7)

Loss of bodily function

123 (37.8)

Pain

184 (56.6)

Being dependent on others

185 (56.9)

Loss of meaning in life

134 (41.2)

Other

60 (18.4)

  1. *Some individuals who were undecided on legalising euthanasia, still answered this question