Skip to main content

Table 4 Included study content coding and themes

From: Factors influencing practitioners’ who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review

Themed factors

Content codes

The number of times the content code was applied

The article where the code was applied (by the first author)

HCPs’ characteristics

Age and experience

4

Harris, Holt, Marek, Nordberg

Gender

3

Willems, Holt, Harris

Place of practice

3

Harris, Holt, Seelig

HCPs’ personal beliefs

Individual preferences

6

Botes, Dawson, Stevens, Marek, Holt

Normative conventions

3

Botes, Tilburt, Curlin

Moral imperatives and conviction

8

Bouthillier, Clymin, Dawson, Tilburt, Nordberg, Marek, Smith, Diniz

Religious tenets

13

Botes, Bouthillier, Clymin, Diniz, Harris, Holt, Nordberg, Tilburt, Willems, Curlin, Stevens, Smith, Dawson

HCPs’ professional ethos

Professional tenets

3

Botes, Bouthillier, Curlin

Application of ethics

6

Escher, Holt, Nordberg, Curlin, Smith, Marek

Emotional labour considerations

Community perception, stigma, and judgement

4

Dawson, Smith, Bouthillier, Diniz

Emotions and fear

3

Bouthillier, Dawson, Clymin

Legal and professional risk

4

Bouthillier, Clymin, Diniz, Willems

Violence

1

Seelig

System and clinical practice considerations

Perceived competence/lack of knowledge

5

Bouthillier, Clymin, Dawson, Holt, Smith

Time, workload and logistics

3

Bouthillier, Dawson, Smith

Preference for other care options, concern for lack of available follow-up care, alternative medical management

4

Escher, Harris, Bouthillier, Clymin

Someone else can or should provide the care

6

Seelig, Botes, Clymin, Dawson, Holt, Nordberg

System factors

4

Clymin, Dawson, Holt, Smith

Patient-related considerations

6

Diniz, Harris, Holt, Marek, Willems, Curlin