Skip to main content

Table 1 Lack of information on ethical approval in health and social sciences articles with Swedish research persons

From: Reporting ethical approval in health and social science articles: an audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislation

Study characteristics

Health sciences, somatic focus

(n = 200)

Health sciences, non-somatic focus

(n = 200)

Social sciences

(n = 200)

Total

(n = 600)

Information

missing

Fisher’s exact

test, p-value

Information

missing

Fisher’s exact

test,p-value

Information

missing

Fisher’s exact test,

p-value

Information

missing

Fisher’s exact

test, p-value

All articles

12/200; 6%

21/200; 11%

54/200; 27%

87/600; 15%

Study type

        

Intervention

2/77; 3%

Non-sign

2/20; 10%

Non-sign

3/24; 13%

Non-sign

7/121; 5%

 < 0.01

Observation

10/123; 8%

 

19/180; 11%

 

51/176; 29%

 

80/479; 17%

 

No. of authors

        

1–2

0/5; 0%

a

6/16; 38%

 < 0.01

24/57: 43%

 < 0.01

30/78: 38%

 < 0.001

 ≥ 3

12/195; 6%

 

15/184: 8%

 

30/143; 20%

 

57/522; 11%

 

University

        

With medical schoolb

12/194; 6%

a

12/165; 7%

 < 0.01

28/116; 27%

Non-sign

54/475; 11%

 < 0.001

Otherc

0/6; 0%

 

9/35; 26%

 

26/84; 31%

 

35/125; 28%

 
  1. Non-sign. p > 0.05
  2. aNot possible to calculate because of low numbers
  3. bIncluding university hospitals
  4. cIncluding 7 articles from non-academic institutions