Table 1 Overview of the Five Factors Based on the Q-Sorts
From: A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
Factor | Label | Ranking rationale(s) |
|---|---|---|
1 | Pragmatic optimism | The medical benefits of CRISPR-Cas9 are supported, unlike non-medical uses. Moral, societal, and governance considerations are less important |
2 | Concerned scepticism | CRISPR-Cas9 has merit as a scientific development, but its applications on humans should be limited. There are many fundamental concerns around the development and use of CRISPR-Cas9 |
3 | Normative optimism | CRISPR-Cas9 offers medical benefits, but only if moral boundaries are safeguarded and societal side-effects are mitigated |
4 | Enthusiastic support | CRISPR-Cas9 is a positive development that improves healthcare. There are few fundamental concerns |
5 | Benevolent generalism | CRISPR-Cas9 is a fascinating, yet complex scientific development. Governance and public participation are important, and other issues will be managed as they arise |