Skip to main content

Table 1 PICOS

From: Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019

PICOS

Inclusion

Exclusion

Population

Stakeholders directly involved within the CECon process

Stakeholders not directly involved within the CECon process

Intervention

Formal assessments of prevailing CECon practice

Description of CECon activities without any relation to assessment in any way.

Comparison

Comparison of prevailing methods and domains of CECon assessment

 

Outcome

Outcome measures and challenges faced in assessing CECon practices, curricula and programs

 

Study Design

Articles formally assessing the quality of CECons as well as papers that discussed the assessment of the quality of CECons

Published between 1st January 1992 and 17th December 2019

Non-English articles without English translations. Opinion articles were excluded.