Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Anderson|
|2 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig L. Fry|
|8 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Ives|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Ives|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 May 2018||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jul 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12910-018-0304-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.