Skip to main content

Table 3 Moral Reasons

From: Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons

Moral Reasons

Respecting importance of conscience or CO (+ 11/− 1; rm.:24)

+

Conscience is an inner voice that requires to be listened to (6)

+

Freedom of conscience is a moral right (4)

+

CO reflects objective moral truth (2)

+

Conflicts of conscience are a regular feature of moral life (2)

+

Degree of intensity and magnitude of an act underlies moral judgment (2)

+

Society and Values, individual liberty and autonomy (1)

+

Respects personal beliefs (1)

-

Moral judgment leads to` values´ (2)

+

Conscience is the “law of the intellect” (1)

+

Conscience is related to personal identification (1)

+

Conscience implies a strong moral conviction (1)

+

Conscience involves a certain intensity of conviction (1)

Criteria for CO (+ 9/−2; rm.:36)

-

Physicians must separate moral belief from professional life (9)

+

HCP’s position must be consistent with their other beliefs and actions (7)

+

Conscience is not one-sided (7)

+

HCP have differing attitudes towards conscience (2)

+

Objection must be to the treatment (2)

+

Position held must be sincere (2)

+

Rationale must reflect valid view of service’s goals (2)

+

Position emerges after alternatives considered (2)

+

Position must fit within coherent system of ethical beliefs (1)

+

Mystifying characteristic: Not backed by reason or logic (1)

-

Position poses risk to HCP’s moral integrity (1)

Moral integrity needs to be respected (+ 5/−1; rm.:22)

-

Women have an access right (12)

+

Acting against own conscience causes moral distress (4)

+

Patient has a moral right to informed consent and refusal (3)

+

Conscience may extend beyond moral reasoning (1)

+

Most compelling moral basis (1)

+

Protection of individual liberty (1)

Normative value of CO (+ 4/−1; rm.:13)

+

Fundamental principle of a pluralistic society (4)

+

Core of humanity (3)

+

Intrinsic value is autonomy and human flourishing (3)

+

Conscience is not infallible (2)

-

CO as synonym for refusal to deliver abortions (1)

CO protects HCP (+ 5/−0; rm.:9)

+

Conscientious position is an “ethical position” of a HCP (5)

+

CO credits the individual conviction against general perception (1)

+

CO encompasses more than simply not performing the intervention (1)

+

CO considers one’s own conduct not that of another (1)

+

CO is a vehicle for HCP who regard such requests objectionable (1)

Conscience is closely related to identity and sense of self (+ 4/−1; rm.:8)

+

Conscience is central to being a whole person (2)

+

Conscience is experienced in relation to own actions (2)

-

Toleration of moral diversity is plausible and questionable (2)

+

Conscience is a driver of human behaviour (1)

+

Failure to follow own conscience generates regret and guilt (1)

Respect for autonomy (+ 3/−1; rm.:10)

-

CO may heighten risk for women living in precarious circumstances (5)

+

Value-neutral care is impossible to be provided (3)

+

Professional CO reflects autonomy of the profession (1)

+

Choices of the patient may be ethically unacceptable (1)

Ignoring conscience of HCP is a form of discrimination (+ 3/− 0; rm.:3)

+

Loss of self-respect (1)

+

Discrimination against well-performing practitioners (1)

+

Discrimination related to religious conscience (1)

Requirement to offer a service (+ 1/−2; rm.:11)

-

Three main arguments for “access” can be rebutted (4)

-

There are biased assumptions of forced access position (4)

+

Consequences follow when conscience rights are eliminated (3)

Freedom of conscience (+ 2/−0; rm.:7)

+

Both the “willing” / “refusing” provider have conscience (6)

+

Conscience is a societal value (1)

Imposing own beliefs (+ 0/−2; rm.:7)

-

Violation of physician’s conscience (5)

-

Patient care over adherence to religious doctrines or self-interest (2)